Experimentation Best Practices
Hypothesis Development
Craft Strong Hypotheses
- Structure: “If [change], then [outcome], because [reasoning]”
- Specific: Define exactly what you’re changing and what you expect to happen
- Measurable: Tie to concrete metrics you can track
- Time-bound: Set clear expectations for when effects should appear
Example Good Hypothesis
“If we add social proof badges to product pages, then conversion rate will increase by 5%, because users trust products that others have purchased.”
Sample Size Planning
Determine Adequate Sample Size
- Use power analysis: Calculate required sample size before starting
- Consider your baseline: Lower baseline rates need larger samples
- Factor in expected lift: Smaller expected changes need more users
- Account for segments: Plan for subgroup analysis needs
General Guidelines
- Minimum Detectable Effect: Aim for changes of at least 2-5%
- Statistical Power: Target 80% power (ability to detect true effects)
- Significance Level: Typically use 95% confidence (α = 0.05)
Metric Selection
Primary Metrics
- Choose 1-2 primary metrics maximum to avoid multiple testing issues
- Select metrics that directly measure your hypothesis
- Ensure metrics are sensitive to your changes (will move within test timeframe)
Guardrail Metrics
- Monitor key business metrics (revenue, retention, satisfaction)
- Track user experience indicators (page load time, error rates)
- Watch for unintended consequences in related product areas
Secondary Metrics
- Help explain the “why” behind primary metric changes
- Provide additional context for decision making
- Explore user behavior patterns
Experiment Design
Randomization Best Practices
- Use proper randomization units (typically users, not sessions)
- Ensure random assignment is consistent across user sessions
- Account for network effects when users can influence each other
- Consider stratification for important user segments
Control Group Management
- Always include a proper control group (status quo)
- Keep control groups large enough for reliable comparisons
- Avoid making changes to control during the experiment
Avoiding Common Pitfalls
Statistical Issues
- Don’t peek at results repeatedly without adjusting significance levels
- Avoid stopping experiments early unless using sequential testing
- Be aware of multiple testing problems when analyzing many metrics
- Don’t cherry-pick time periods for analysis
Implementation Issues
- Validate exposure event tracking before launching
- Test your experiment setup with a small percentage first
- Monitor for technical issues that could bias results
- Ensure consistent user experience across variant groups
Business Context
- Consider external factors (holidays, marketing campaigns, seasonality)
- Account for learning effects (users adapting to changes over time)
- Plan for network effects in social or marketplace products
- Think about long-term vs. short-term impacts
Running Experiments at Scale
Experiment Pipeline
- Maintain a roadmap of planned experiments
- Prioritize based on potential impact and ease of implementation
- Allow adequate time between related experiments
- Document learnings for organizational knowledge
Resource Management
- Plan engineering resources for implementation and monitoring
- Coordinate with marketing teams to avoid conflicting campaigns
- Consider user fatigue from too many simultaneous experiments
- Balance learning goals with product development velocity
Statistical Considerations
Sequential vs. Frequentist Testing
- Sequential Testing: Good for detecting large effects quickly, allows early stopping
- Frequentist Testing: Better for small effect detection, requires full test duration
- Choose based on your goals: Quick decisions vs. precise measurements
Handling Multiple Variants
- Limit the number of variants to maintain statistical power
- Adjust significance levels when making multiple comparisons
- Plan your analysis approach before starting the test
Advanced Topics
Segmentation Analysis
- Plan key segments in advance (new vs. returning users, etc.)
- Use interaction effects to understand segment differences
- Be cautious about post-hoc segmentation (can lead to false discoveries)
- Consider segment size requirements for reliable results
Long-term Effects
- Plan for post-experiment monitoring to catch delayed effects
- Consider novelty effects that may wear off over time
- Think about user learning curves for complex features
- Monitor competitive responses that might influence results
⚠️
Remember that experimentation is both an art and a science. While these guidelines provide a strong foundation, always consider your specific product context and user base when designing experiments.
Additional Resources
Was this page useful?